<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>ETBlogs Soapbox - Latest Comments in Bonus babies &amp;#8211; at your expense</title><link>http://etblogs-soapbox.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://etblogs-soapbox.disqus.com/bonus_babies_at_your_expense/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:58:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Bonus babies &amp;#8211; at your expense</title><link>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/soapbox/2008/12/03/bonus-babies-at-your-expense/#comment-5610147</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No, but I wouldn't raise a stink if you got a 2.5% raise for writing a rational, well written article.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Helga Dorfeister</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:58:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bonus babies &amp;#8211; at your expense</title><link>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/soapbox/2008/12/03/bonus-babies-at-your-expense/#comment-5610146</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great to see a new "blog".  Now you can get Johnson &amp;amp; Benton back on line.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regarding this column.....Dumb(government) is as dumb(government) does.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Delaney</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:58:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>