ETBlogs Soapbox - Latest Comments

Re: All of them, and then some

Frankuchar — Sat, 23 Apr 2011 23:12:57 -0000

He should go back to the Dominican Republic, since they all love him so much. We don't need his corrupt island politics here. This is Lawrence, Mass. USa. Not Little Dominican Republic. We fly the american flag here.

Re: About

SpeakingOutHere — Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:59:55 -0000

"In Praise of Winter" Taylor Armerding 12/30/11

(January and June both start with "J"!)

Weather Forecast For Massachusetts Jan-March 2011

ColdSnowIceRainSleetBackToSnow
Nor'easterWindyHighTidesRealCold
IceRainSleetSnowVeryVeryCold!!!!
AllKindsOfWinterS#*tThatIsFallingFromTheSky!!!!

SomeSun!!Wind,Cold,MoreBlowingSnow,Ice,Sand,Salt
Frostbite,FrozenSnow,Arthritis,BodyAches,
Shoveling,Snowblowing,Sneezing,Shivering,Sniffling,Snivelling
Swearing,Slipping,Scraping,Sliding,SoSickOfIt!!!!

I Think I Can, I Think I Can,

I Think I Can Deal With It Some More Because Right Now I Have No Choice But To Deal With It!
We Are Not Alone In Our Suffering!

Re: About

Tom Gilroy/Kelly Curran — Fri, 12 Nov 2010 20:43:04 -0000

Dear Senator Brown;

Senator Brown the reason both the right and the left are not happy with you is because you want to be the “man in the middle”. It is not that you are "doing something right", but it is that you are continuously positioning yourself to be someone who can be brought over to either side of the aisle. You are playing a political game and we see right through your antics, but as was evidenced by the recent mid-term election, that the American people are also tired of these games.

You claim to be an "independent voice", which means you, are in a sense, someone who can be swayed to either side. When it is convenient you can vote with the Democrats on one piece of legislation", which as you often say " is good for Massachusetts" and when you decide you want to vote with the Republicans, on what you determine to be a good piece of legislation, you can do that also. Basically, whichever way the wind blows, and whatever mood fancies the Senator, you can decide which way or with what party you will align yourself. You are an "independent voice", and he won't be told what to do by any party. You have completely lost the people, who worked so hard and gave so much to elect you. We are fed up with the games and the politics. You are as political as any of member of the Senate. If you want to be an “independent voice”, why are you a Republican? What you fail to realize, Senator Brown, is that Republicans need you to stand up and stand straight and join ranks with the rest of the Party members. The Republican Leadership needs everyone with an "R", to band together. Now is not the time to play political football with the direction of the country and it certainly isn't the time to be bi-partisan on any of these critical issues.

It has become evident to us, Senator Brown, that you are only interested in you own political career and what is best for Scott Brown. You are not interested in moving the country forward and you are not interested in stopping the Obama Administration and the rest of the socialist agenda in its tracks. This is not your priority. Your only priority is to win re-election. This is what makes Scott Brown tick.
It is time for the games to end and for Senator Brown to take a stand as to where his allegiances lie. It is time to get out of the middle and to decide what side of the aisle you are on.

We will not lift our little pinky finger for you during your re-election. You have shown no intestinal fortitude and we expected more from someone in your position and from someone who appeared to have so much promise when you were elected in January. Make no mistake about it Senator Brown the money that fueled your campaign from around the country was not from “Independents” or RINO Republicans, but from Tea Party supporting conservatives. The US Senate is not the Great and General Court of Massachusetts and you are not a token member who is always in a position of weakness. The destiny of our great Country is in your hands and you have taken an oath to protect and defend the Constitution. Our Constitution is being eroded and you have a responsibility to stand shoulder to shoulder with your fellow Republicans to prevent further erosion and repeal the unconstitutional legislation passed in this session

It is time to “Man Up” and stop playing these games, or you will no longer find yourself in the middle with your "independent voice", but on the outside with no voice at all.

Respectfully,

Kelly Curran
and
Thomas Gilroy
Chelmsford, MA

Re: Don’t be in such a Rush

Answering Service — Tue, 09 Nov 2010 10:46:33 -0000

James Carville is a zany guy, but he sure knows political strategy.

Re: All of them, and then some

Stevehill — Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:50:42 -0000

Oddly, he is a rock star in his homeland...as well as to 75% of the Lawrence electorate.

Re: All the credit, none of the blame

Ilovesnapple — Fri, 18 Jun 2010 01:04:13 -0000

John, I expect your firm grasp of sarcasm certainly would have comforted him.

Re: All the credit, none of the blame

john milks — Thu, 27 May 2010 12:12:21 -0000

Nice in-depth intellectual editorial. Deval Patrick is responsible for all the unemployment in this state, in fact he is responsible for all the unemployment in the US and world. It's also his fault that the Bruins blew a 3-0 game lead. Since you think you're brilliant enough to write this column, why don't you enlighten us all on how Patrick's policies led to the unemployment situation in this state? Please tell us all how it had nothing to do with the national/international/global meltdown in Oct 2008.
BTW Craig Smith...who you wrote so eloquently about in March 7,2010 died this AM of cancer....I'm sure your sensitive words greatly comforted him in his last hours...

Re: Any word but the “r” word

jacrlsn — Fri, 07 May 2010 19:45:45 -0000

Ha, Ha, Ha, Your politically correct side is showing err whats that, oh its your tongue in cheek?

Re: Segregation by any other name …

jacrlsn — Fri, 07 May 2010 19:40:56 -0000

It is a typical manifestation of liberal rationale. They don't relate things , it's only what staring them in the face thats important.

Re: Job creation 101

jacrlsn — Fri, 07 May 2010 19:36:17 -0000

No, they haven't and won't. Its too easy to think its great and the right thing to do. I mean what can be wrong with getting these poor low paid people more money? Its motherhood and apple pie!!!!

Re: Don’t say no mo’, Joe

LoneRanger8491 — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:35:36 -0000

Biden's problem is he has an 8 1/2 shoe to fit in his 12 1/2 mouth so actually he has room for both shoes. Invision something happening to Obama and Biden as president and Pelosi as v.p. with Harry Reid in the wings.

Re: Studied to death

jacrlsn — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:57:28 -0000

There is only one appropriate comment.

VOTE OUT ALL INCUMBENTS, EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM

Re: Studied to death

jacrlsn — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:54:49 -0000

There is only one appropriate comment.

VOTE OUT ALL INCUMBENTS, EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM

Re: Promises? What promises?

jacrlsn — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:52:24 -0000

WELL WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM THE PROGRESSIVE SOCIALISTS.

VOTE OUT ALL INCUMBENTS EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM.

Re: Watch what they did …

jacrlsn — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:42:02 -0000

No one should believe anything politicians say.
VOTE OUT ALL INCUMBENTS, EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM

Re: Don’t say no mo’, Joe

Beffie — Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:21:02 -0000

Really, really? What a maroon!

Re: Please (shhh!) bring on the tolls

jacrlsn — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:00:27 -0000

Sounds like the perverted thinking that would come from Beacon Hill but only if New Hampshire does it first.

Re: Patrick could have shamed picketers

jacrlsn — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:51:30 -0000

Despite the Brown victory, I don't think the public in this state (err Commonwealth) would recognize ridiculousness.

Re: Mayor ‘no comment’

jacrlsn — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:47:37 -0000

If you can't say anything negative about him, there would be nothing to say.

Re: Joe 4 Senate

jacrlsn — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:22:00 -0000

you are probably right and that would have been a pity

Re: Joe 4 Senate

davemarciano — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:01:19 -0000

I certainly doubt that everyone has had enough with tax and spend foolishness.let him watch him crash and burn.

Re: Joe 4 Senate

It_is_I — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:22:09 -0000

There you go again. Funny as all get out.

First of all, those celebrating Scott Brown's victory should note that, yes, there was discontent over Democratic policy in DC. They should also note that not only did Brown run a great campaign, Martha Coakley ran a LOUSY campaign. Brown won the race, fair and square, but you have to also factor in that Coakley helped him a lot by LOSING.

Had Joe Kennedy decided to go back into politics, and run for his uncle's seat, he likely would have WON.

Re: Pat Robertson should shut up

Stuart Duncan — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:54:54 -0000

Hey, real mature post there! That really adds a lot to the discussion.

I think you meant "staunch"? Apparently only Republicans can spell.

Re: Pat Robertson should shut up

It_is_I — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:22:30 -0000

While the Trib is absolutely right on about the skittish and erratic Robertson on this one, why did they go out on a limb and editorialize against him?

Well, even stauch Republicans / Bush supporters / Palin worshippers / right wing conservatives have to occasionally distance themselves from their own bad apples.

Re: Astroturf explained, exposed!!

HeywoodJa — Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:44:33 -0000

Jeeez, that's funny! Ya have to wonder if that poor slob is able to dress himself properly in the morning!