<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>ETBlogs Soapbox - Latest Comments in Level for me, but not for thee</title><link>http://etblogs-soapbox.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://etblogs-soapbox.disqus.com/level_for_me_but_not_for_thee/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:13:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Level for me, but not for thee</title><link>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/soapbox/2008/04/15/level-for-me-but-not-for-thee/#comment-5609953</link><description>&lt;p&gt;BR&lt;br&gt;Mr Amerdings commentary was geared toward the Governors&lt;br&gt;cowardice, but don't forget it was our tenured legislature who passed it.&lt;br&gt;There is probably no one in Massachusetts who thinks the&lt;br&gt;small Government act should pass but you, me and Carla Howell.&lt;br&gt;thank God, the brainwashing hasn't worked on everyone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jacrlsn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:13:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Level for me, but not for thee</title><link>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/soapbox/2008/04/15/level-for-me-but-not-for-thee/#comment-5609952</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This may be a stretch, but does anyone think this has anything to do with the possibility of a question to abolish the income tax on the ballot?&lt;br&gt;I've been hearing a lot about the Small Government Act lately which Carla Howell is trying to get on the ballot...&lt;br&gt;Could the state be worried this might actually happen? Hey, I'm all for it, but that's a discussion for another day...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm not trying to hijack this thread, but it's just a thought that occurred to me....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I, for one, would be interested in reading the editorials of Mr. Armerding, Mr. Johnson, and Mr. Benton regarding the Small Government Act....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bilge rat</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:46:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Level for me, but not for thee</title><link>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/soapbox/2008/04/15/level-for-me-but-not-for-thee/#comment-5609951</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does this also apply to state workers who file wage disputes against their employer, the Commonwealth of Mass? Ergo, the taxpayers will pick up the tab.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, who will really paying the "punitive" damages? Companies will pass the cost on to the consumer....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just another example of how out of touch our esteemed Governor really is....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks a lot, Guv....Together we can....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bilge rat</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:37:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Level for me, but not for thee</title><link>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/soapbox/2008/04/15/level-for-me-but-not-for-thee/#comment-5609950</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. Amerding,&lt;br&gt;It would do no good for the legislative branch to pass such a law because the judicial branch would be sure that no employee ever lost such a suit.&lt;br&gt;Only in Massachusetts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jacrlsn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:57:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>