-
Website
http://blogs.eagletribune.com/soapbox -
Original page
http://blogs.eagletribune.com/soapbox/2007/12/13/the-problem-in-a-nutshell/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
jacrlsn
187 comments · 243 points
-
macsurf
2 comments · 432 points
-
cobrapestcontrol
1 comment · 1 points
-
Swing Trading
2 comments · 1 points
-
OnlineCasino
2 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
What an unbelievable story! Is this guy still on the force?
How many more examples do the sheeple need in this state before they smarten up and start voting these morons out of office who continue to support these kind of policies?
Wake up!
But we get it! Cherry pick a story. Then generalize it to all public safety personell in. The smear campaign continues. Are their any independent thinkers on your staff?
Personally, we can't all work for the governments and if governments continue to grow, there won't be a any alternative. We won't have to worry about the giant sucking sound of jobs going to Canada and Mexico, because all our time will be spent regulating each other and another name for that is fascism.
If you would please offer me some suggestions. What is it that you think needs to change? Please try to be fair as you understand that union members are supporting households too.
They are using the reprehensible actions, or inactions, of a bad cop as an example of why people are opposed to any increases in property taxes
Mr. Benton even suggested this rogue cop is also an example of why so many people would abolish the income tax if they could.
Come on.
It's all propaganda on the part of the anti-tax jihadists who love to follow the anti-tax cult leader Barbara Anderson right over the cliff of communal and civic destruction.
It is because of selfish people like the anti-tax jihadists that the town of Saugus had to scrap its entire after school sports program.
It's because of the selfish anti-tax jihadists that the city of Gloucester is forced to choose between paying a bad cop in the name of "public safety" and funding music and art programs in the schools
But what realy galls me about many of the anti-tax jihadists is their hypocrisy.
Currently in Newburyport and Newbuy,some residents of those towns who live on Plum Island have formed a group that is asking both communities to provide $1500 a month in taxpayer dollars to procure the services of a Wahington DC firm to lobby Congress to help them protect their properties from beach erosion.
Now, I know at least two people involved with that group who were vociferous in their opposition to any efforts to allow for an override to provide increased funding for the schools and other municipal services.
Yet, they have no problem asking for tax dollars to pay a DC lobbying group to advocate on their behalf before Congress.
I mean, can we talk hypocrisy here?
I don't mind paying taxes to fund the schools and other important community services.
But I take great umbrage at having some nouveau riche, bourgious bohemian, anti-tax jihadist, who's stupid enough to build an architecturally bankrupt trophy house on a tiny lot, on a barrier island that, when a storm like Katrina hits, is going to all but disappear, expect my tax dollars to bail him out of his own stupid decision making.
But that's often the true nature of the anti-tax jihadist beast, they personify what my late brother used to call "I've got mine, so to hell with everybody else."
I live in Lawrence and enjoy the lowest tax burden in the Merrimack valley. I have not, and will not, complain about a tax increase as long as its justified.
OK, you asked for some suggestions and is it regarding the conduct of unions in negotiating that you are looking for the suggestions?
If so, the most important one i can make is for the unions to stop believing that once there has been a negotiation on a subject that from that point on it is set in stone and can never be renegotiated unless its onward and upward. The best negotiation is one in which both parties feel they've won (real or not)
Earlier on this blog, I said the state cities and towns are at fault (probably more than the unions) because they have been a weak kneed bunch who apparently felt that labor peace was more important than fairness to the taxpayers. The only way I know to solve that problem is to vote the incumbents out. We can't do much worse with all new people.
Term limits of one but certainly no more than two terms should clean the house after 2 or 3 election cycles.
We (collective we,) have to do something to stop this stupidity. Taxpayers feel as though they're being squeezed to death financially and public employees (not politicians) feel they're being blamed for the blatent mismanagement of our cities, towns and state.
Yes, I'm the same Scott.
It has not been my experience that once something is negotiated that it is not set in stone. In practice, every few years when contracts run their course both sides (management and labor) come to the table and bargain. During that process all items,old and new, are open for discussion. In most cases concessions made by both sides in order to setle a contract.
I couldn't agree with you more that public employees feel like they are being blamed for mismanagement by towns and cities. The reason being, we are in fact being blamed, almost daily, by the editors and writers at the Eagle Tribune.