<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>ETBlogs Soapbox - Latest Comments in Who&amp;#8217;s the boss?</title><link>http://etblogs-soapbox.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://etblogs-soapbox.disqus.com/who8217s_the_boss/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:12:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s the boss?</title><link>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/soapbox/2008/01/15/whos-the-boss/#comment-5609657</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I see some practical benefit to settling some of the larger bargaining unit contract negotiations prior to Town Meeting. The financial tradeoffs and uncertainties that voters must consider are complex enough without adding further ambiguity from unsettled negotiations.&lt;br&gt;Andover voters indeed make the final decision about how much they will be taxed for the services they desire, but it has not been the town's practice to ask voters to explicitly decide the level of salary increase that bargaining units should receive.&lt;br&gt;I suggest that the designated negotiation teams should strive to reach fair and equitable agreements, and that town voters should decide what services they are willing to pay for - having a clear and realistic understanding of what those services really cost.&lt;br&gt;Andover voters have a recent history of denying requests for operating budget overrides, yet approving appropriations for increasing numbers of staff. Even if barganing units were to agree to zero salary increase for the next three years, the current financial predictions indicate that there would be insufficient revenues to sustain the current number of employees and associated services without an override.&lt;br&gt;While salary increases can certainly have a significant impact on the magnitude of the current budget deficit, the contract negotiations are not the key financial issue facing Andover voters. The key issue is how much to increase revenues (through fees and property taxes) and/or decrease staff and services across all the departments of the town.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Merritt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:12:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s the boss?</title><link>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/soapbox/2008/01/15/whos-the-boss/#comment-5609656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Children will suffer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your children will suffer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our children will suffer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;TIM VAN WEY&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;OK, OK, we get it.....&lt;br&gt;It's for the children....&lt;br&gt;The poor, suffering, underprivileged kids in Andover....&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bilge rat</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:31:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s the boss?</title><link>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/soapbox/2008/01/15/whos-the-boss/#comment-5609655</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I stand corrected....today an Andover Teacher (in an editorial) did use "the children will be harmed" .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:30:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s the boss?</title><link>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/soapbox/2008/01/15/whos-the-boss/#comment-5609654</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just another in a long line of anti-union columns by Taylor Amerding and the Eagle Tribune. By the way Taylor, the "What about the children" reference in every one of your columns is getting old.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:08:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>