http://etblogs-soapbox.disqus.com/enMon, 18 Feb 2008 01:19:22 -0000http://blogs.eagletribune.com/soapbox/2008/02/13/winners-bad-losers-good/#comment-5609803<p>Shess a communist and doesnt understand if she gets the nomination there will be no more companies to create jobs and wealthy people we are all going to leave. Then she will be leaft with rats.</p>Uncle BunkyMon, 18 Feb 2008 01:19:22 -0000http://blogs.eagletribune.com/soapbox/2008/02/13/winners-bad-losers-good/#comment-5609802<p>Steve, what is it about Mr. Armerding's comment:<br>"Clinton said that if she is elected president she will take those profits - notice she didn’t say a portion of those profits - and invest them in alternative energy sources. A very green thing to say, although plenty of private companies are already investing in alternative energy. What is she going to do to them if they start getting profitable?", that you don't comprehend? All I can say it get a grip, get a life!</p>Tom DelaneySat, 16 Feb 2008 16:12:47 -0000http://blogs.eagletribune.com/soapbox/2008/02/13/winners-bad-losers-good/#comment-5609801<p>Re: Exxon profits. Maybe the answer should be forcing the energy companies to put more monies into other type of energy,say hydogen or electric. They could sell the new energy at their present stations. Give them the tax breaks for the start-up in the supply systems. The oil companies have deisel pumps at most stations why not electric plugs and hydogen tanks?</p>steve BurrellWed, 13 Feb 2008 15:10:52 -0000